Clima Familiar y Desempeño Escolar

Autores/as

Palabras clave:

clima familiar, desempeño escolar, familia

Resumen

El presente artículo de revisión tiene como objetivo analizar de manera sistemática la evidencia científica sobre la relación entre el clima familiar y el desempeño escolar, identificando las dimensiones del entorno familiar que inciden en el rendimiento académico, la adaptación escolar y el bienestar socioemocional de los estudiantes. La revisión se desarrolló siguiendo la metodología PRISMA 2020, mediante la búsqueda, selección y análisis de artículos publicados en bases de datos internacionales entre 2000 y 2024. Se incluyeron investigaciones que abordaron familias de diversa composición, niveles socioeconómicos y contextos socioculturales, considerando tanto cuantitativos como cualitativos. Indican que un clima familiar positivo, caracterizado por cohesión, afecto, comunicación abierta y estructuras claras, se asocia significativamente con un mayor rendimiento académico, motivación, autorregulación y adaptación escolar. Se identifican factores mediadores como la autoestima académica, la regulación emocional y la participación parental, así como la influencia moduladora del contexto socioeconómico y cultural. Se evidencian vacíos de investigación relacionados con poblaciones diversas, longitudinales y análisis de transformaciones socioculturales recientes. Estos hallazgos subrayan la importancia de fortalecer el clima familiar como estrategia de intervención educativa y social, contribuyendo al bienestar integral de los estudiantes y a la equidad educativa.

Referencias

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international research. Routledge.

Bornstein, M. H. (2019). Handbook of parenting: Volume 1, Children and parenting (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2019). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011737

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 793–828). Wiley.

CEPAL. (2020). Panorama social de América Latina 2020. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/46687-panorama-social-america-latina-2020

Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., & Martin, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.x

Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.487

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Denham, S. A., Bassett, H. H., Thayer, S. K., Mincic, M. S., Sirotkin, Y. S., & Zinsser, K. (2020). Social-emotional learning and school success: Integrating theory and research. Early Education and Development, 31(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2019.1679407

Dweck, C. S. (2017). Mindset: Changing the way you think to fulfil your potential. Hachette UK.

Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x

Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Fan, W., & Williams, C. M. (2018). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement, and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 38(6), 831–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1316995

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

García Coll, C., Akiba, D., Palacios, N., Bailey, B., Silver, R., DiMartino, L., & Chin, C. (2016). Parental involvement and academic achievement in cultural context. Child Development, 87(6), 1829–1846. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12541

Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Grolnick, W. S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2009). Issues and challenges in studying parental control: Toward a new conceptualization. Child Development Perspectives, 3(3), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00088.x

Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Autonomy in children's learning and development: An overview. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419880245

Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015362

Jeynes, W. H. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of different types of parental involvement programs for urban students. Urban Education, 47(4), 706–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912445643

Kagitcibasi, C. (2017). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Technical Report EBSE-2007-01). Keele University and University of Durham.

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1–e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

Martínez, F., & García, P. (2020). Clima familiar y rendimiento académico: Una revisión sistemática. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Educación, 12(2), 45–67.

Masten, A. S. (2014). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development. Guilford Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: Provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development, 56(2), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129720

Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (2009). Family environment scale manual: Development, applications, research (4th ed.). Mind Garden.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume III): What school life means for students' lives. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-en

OECD. (2021). The state of school education: One year into the COVID pandemic. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/201dde84-en

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Papalia, D. E., & Martorell, G. (2021). Desarrollo humano (14ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417

UNESCO. (2021). Informe de seguimiento de la educación en el mundo 2021/2: Los actores no estatales en la educación: ¿Quién elige? ¿Quién pierde? UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2022). Informe de seguimiento de la educación en el mundo 2022: Género. Profundizar en el debate sobre quiénes todavía están rezagados. UNESCO.

Wang, M. T., & Sheikh-Khalil, S. (2014). Does parental involvement matter for student achievement and mental health in high school? Child Development, 85(2), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12153

Descargas

Publicado

2026-09-18

Número

Sección

Artículos