Competências Digitais Docentes na era Pós-Pandemia

Gabriel Henrique  Azevedo Lima

Autores/as

Gabriel Henrique Azevedo Lima Universidade Federal do Acre Autor/a https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7261-1746

Palabras clave:

competências digitais docentes, era pós-pandemia, educação

Resumen

O presente artigo de revisão sistemática tem como objetivo analisar as competências digitais docentes na era pós-pandemia, identificando oportunidades, desafios e lacunas no desenvolvimento de habilidades tecnológicas e pedagógicas em contextos de educação superior e educação básica. Foi aplicada a metodologia PRISMA 2020 para garantir a transparência e a replicabilidade do estudo, realizando uma busca exaustiva em bases de dados acadêmicas (Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, Google Scholar e SciELO) entre os anos de 2020 e 2024. Foram selecionados estudos que abordaram competências digitais docentes, integração tecnológica, formação de professores e experiências pós-COVID-19, avaliando sua qualidade por meio de critérios de inclusão e exclusão e categorizando os achados em dimensões analíticas chave. Os resultados evidenciam que a pandemia acelerou a adoção de ferramentas digitais, mas também revelou lacunas significativas em capacitação, infraestrutura e alfabetização digital. Destaca-se a necessidade de uma abordagem integrada que combine conhecimentos tecnológicos, pedagógicos e contextuais (TPACK), bem como estratégias de formação contínua, políticas institucionais e apoio técnico. Em síntese, o estudo conclui que o fortalecimento das competências digitais docentes é essencial para garantir uma educação inclusiva, resiliente e de qualidade na era pós-pandemia.

Referencias

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 10(1), 5–28.

European Commission. (2017). DigCompEdu: The Digital Competence Framework for Educators. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Commission. (2021). Digital Education Action Plan (2021–2027). Publications Office of the European Union.

Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. JRC Technical Report. Joint Research Centre.

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.

Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351.

Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2022). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review.

Joanna Briggs Institute. (2017). JBI Critical Appraisal Tools. Joanna Briggs Institute.

Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2022). TPACK: The framework and its development. In M. J. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), The TPACK Framework (pp. 1–18). Routledge.

Krumsvik, R. J. (2011). Digital competence in teacher education: A literature review. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6(4), 1–16.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., & Nandagiri, R. (2021). The Digital Frontier: A Review of the Risks and Opportunities of Digital Technology for Children and Youth. UNICEF Office of Research.

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–36.

OECD. (2020). Education responses to COVID-19: Embracing digital learning and online collaboration. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on education: Insights and implications. OECD Publishing.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.

Redecker, C. (2020). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu): Update and policy implications. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(1), 1–9.

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2017). ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the “ICT as an instrument” perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 1–20.

Tufanaru, C., Munn, Z., Aromataris, E., Campbell, J., & Hopp, L. (2020). Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-04

UNESCO. (2021). Digital transformation in education: A framework for policy action. UNESCO.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932

World Bank. (2021). Remote Learning during COVID-19: Lessons from Today, Principles for Tomorrow. World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/160271637074230077/pdf/Remote-Learning-During-COVID-19-Lessons-from-Today-Principles-for-Tomorrow.pdf